Thursday, November 11, 2010
Lyman Beecher
Personal Bio:
· Birthday: October 12, 1775 in New Haven Connecticut U.S
· Death: January 10, 1863 in Brooklyn New York, U.S
· Nationality: American
· Entered Yale in 1793.
· Presbyterian Clergy Man
· Reformer, educator, and central figure in theological controversies.
· 1799 he was ordained as pastor of the Presbyterian Church at East Hampton, Long Island, N. Y.
· 1826 Beecher became pastor of the Hanover Street Church of Boston
· Defended orthodoxy against Unitarianism which made him very popular
Issues:
· Fear of Catholicism began to emerge and led me to share in the nativist attack on that faith
· I wasn’t sure if I wanted to Christianize the West and educate the ministers because my desire was to cancel Catholic influence in the Ohio River Valley
· Debate over slavery in 1834 divided students and faculty that it took years for Lane Seminary to recover-I am in favor of anti-slavery
· Religion is what motivates me to challenge the gov’t and other people. I want people who believe to fully understand everything about our religion.
· While preaching, enforcement of the liquor laws was not strict and no one really showed a big opinion about excessive drinking
· Indirectly responsible for the sacking of a convent of Ursuline nuns at Charlestown by the Boston mob
Solutions:
· Individual moral reform is very important, it is the reason I give sermons, people listen and then they change themselves
· 1825- preached 6 successful sermons on the evils of excessive drinking (intemperance)
· 1831- gave a series of negative sermons against the Catholics
· The conservative Presbyterians attacked me with charges of heresy, slander, and hypocrisy
-Heresy because my interpretation of the Westminster Confession differed from theirs
-Slander because I maintained that my views were of a large body of evangelical Christians
-Hypocrisy because I pretended that my doctrines squared with the Scriptures and the Confession
Cronin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I, Joseph Smith, would be uncomfortable sitting next to you at the dinner party. We do not share the same beliefs and you openly go against Unitarianism which is what I believe a religion should be. Our disagreements in religion would only lead to an argument and cause great attention to ourselves at the dinner party.
ReplyDelete